The documentary 'NAZA' has become the subject of critical scrutiny following an opinion piece published by Haaretz. The author of the piece reports feeling shocked after viewing the film, though the primary focus of the critique is not the content itself, but rather the significant omissions made by the creators.

While the documentary aims to present a specific perspective, the Haaretz analysis argues that the filmmakers intentionally left out crucial context. By failing to include certain historical or situational facts, the documentary reportedly presents an incomplete picture of the subject matter. The author suggests that these exclusions are not merely editorial oversights but are instead deliberate choices that shape the viewer's perception in a misleading way.

Because the original source is an opinion column rather than a traditional news report, the specific facts omitted are not detailed in the text. The critique centers on the ethical implications of documentary filmmaking when creators choose to curate information to fit a specific narrative. The piece serves as a warning to audiences to remain skeptical of documentaries that may prioritize emotional impact or a singular viewpoint over a comprehensive representation of the truth. As of now, the creators of 'NAZA' have not issued a public response to these specific allegations of bias or omission.