Six months have passed since the initiation of US-Israeli airstrikes targeting Iranian infrastructure and military assets. The conflict has evolved into a high-stakes struggle for dominance over the Strait of Hormuz, a critical maritime chokepoint for global oil supplies.

While the stated objectives of the strikes were to curb Iranian regional influence and disrupt its military capabilities, the long-term strategic results remain a subject of debate. Al Jazeera reports that the focus of the engagement has shifted significantly toward securing the Strait, suggesting that the maritime theater has become the primary battleground for both sides.

Data regarding the total cost of the war—both in terms of human lives and economic impact—is currently being compiled by research groups like AJLabs. However, there is no consensus on whether the strikes have successfully deterred Iranian actions or if they have instead led to a hardening of Tehran's regional policy. The lack of transparent reporting from all involved military commands makes it difficult to verify the extent of damage inflicted on Iranian facilities versus the operational costs incurred by the US and Israel. As the conflict enters its seventh month, the international community remains divided on whether these military actions have achieved their intended security goals or if they have merely escalated regional instability.