The Coalition has unveiled a proposal to drastically streamline the National Construction Code, intending to reduce the document from over 2,000 pages to approximately 80 pages. Under this plan, current mandatory requirements for energy efficiency and accessibility in new residential builds would be reclassified as optional features rather than compulsory standards. Andrew Bragg, the Coalition’s housing and environment spokesperson, stated that the objective is to ensure new homes remain “basic and safe” while removing what the party views as excessive regulatory burden.

This proposal has drawn immediate criticism from housing and environmental advocates. Opponents describe the plan as a “cost-of-living timebomb,” arguing that removing energy efficiency mandates will lead to higher utility bills for future homeowners and tenants, as homes will be less effective at regulating temperature. Critics also contend that making accessibility features optional will deepen social inequality by reducing the availability of homes suitable for people with disabilities or the elderly. While the Coalition frames the move as a necessary simplification of building rules, critics emphasize the long-term financial and social consequences of prioritizing reduced regulation over established efficiency and accessibility standards.