Conflicting accounts have emerged regarding a reported missile attack by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) against US military installations in Jordan. The IRGC has publicly claimed responsibility for strikes on infrastructure at the King Hussein and al-Azraq bases, characterizing the action as a retaliatory measure following alleged US attacks on Iran’s Larak Island.

In contrast, reports citing US sources present a different outcome. According to information relayed by Fox News, while an attack did occur, the majority of the incoming missiles were intercepted by defensive systems. These reports indicate that there has been no significant impact on US forces or infrastructure thus far. The IRGC has issued a broader warning, stating that any perceived aggression against the Islamic Republic will be met with a "crushing response" as part of its ongoing efforts to maintain control over the Strait of Hormuz.

The discrepancy between the two accounts centers on the effectiveness of the attack. The IRGC statement implies a successful strike on specific infrastructure, whereas the US-sourced reports emphasize the success of defensive interceptions and the lack of significant damage. As of now, official confirmation from the Pentagon regarding the extent of the damage or the specific nature of the intercepted projectiles remains limited, leaving the full scope of the incident subject to these competing narratives.