thread.news
← Back
BGenerally CredibleWorld🇮🇳India⚠ Coverage gap10/24/2026, 3:56:14 AM
Delhi High Court Asks Film Producers to Respond to Sourav Ganguly's Lawsuit

Delhi High Court Asks Film Producers to Respond to Sourav Ganguly's Lawsuit

The Delhi High Court has issued a notice to the producers of the film 'Doosra' following a legal challenge from former cricketer Sourav Ganguly. Ganguly alleges that the film uses his likeness and personality without his authorization.

Share
Coverage
leftcenterrightinternationalinvestigative

The Delhi High Court has officially requested a response from the production team behind the film 'Doosra' regarding a lawsuit filed by former Indian cricket captain Sourav Ganguly. In his plea, Ganguly claims that the filmmakers have infringed upon his personality rights by utilizing his image and identity in the project without obtaining the necessary permissions.

Personality rights, often referred to as publicity rights, protect an individual's right to control the commercial use of their name, image, and likeness. High-profile figures frequently invoke these rights to prevent unauthorized entities from profiting from their fame or associating them with products or media they have not endorsed. The court's decision to issue a notice is a standard procedural step, requiring the filmmakers to present their side of the argument before the bench can determine if an injunction or further legal action is warranted.

As of now, the producers of 'Doosra' have not publicly released a detailed defense regarding the specific allegations of unauthorized usage. The case highlights the ongoing legal tension between creative expression in biographical or sports-themed cinema and the personal rights of the individuals depicted. The court is expected to review the arguments from both parties in upcoming hearings to decide whether the film's content constitutes a violation of Ganguly's legal protections.

📡 Media Analysis

How each outlet framed the story — angles, word choices, and what they chose to push or ignore.

Hindustan TimesCenterA

Reported the procedural legal development without offering commentary or context on the film's content.

"alleging violation of his personality rights"

"seeks response"

⚡ Where Sources Disagree

  • ·Whether the film's depiction of Ganguly falls under protected creative expression or unauthorized commercial exploitation.

🔍 What Nobody's Reporting

  • ·The specific scenes or elements of the film that triggered the complaint.
  • ·The response or statement from the filmmakers regarding the legal notice.

📰 Sources

0 A-rated source(s) among 1 total. Lowest trust: Hindustan Times (B)