The phrase 'one step away from total victory' has become a recurring theme in Israeli political discourse regarding the ongoing war in Gaza. However, military experts and analysts are increasingly questioning the accuracy of this assessment. While government officials maintain that sustained military pressure is the only path to eliminating Hamas's governing and military capabilities, critics argue that the term 'total victory' lacks a clear, achievable definition in the context of urban guerrilla warfare.

Haaretz reports that the reality on the ground suggests a more complex situation than the binary narrative of victory or defeat. The outlet highlights that while the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have achieved significant tactical successes, the absence of a post-war governance plan complicates the long-term strategic outlook. Some analysts suggest that the focus on 'total victory' may be more of a political messaging strategy intended to maintain public morale rather than a reflection of current operational progress.

Conversely, supporters of the current military strategy argue that the destruction of Hamas's infrastructure is a necessary precursor to any future stability. They contend that any cessation of hostilities before the group is fully dismantled would constitute a failure. The debate remains polarized, with disagreement over whether the military objectives are being met at a pace that justifies the humanitarian and economic costs incurred during the campaign. As the conflict continues, the gap between official rhetoric and the assessments of independent security experts remains a primary point of contention in the national conversation.