thread.news
← Back
BGenerally CrediblePolitics🇺🇸US⚠ Coverage gap10/25/2026, 10:44:22 PM
Federal Appeals Court Skeptical of DOJ Request to Segregate California Ballots

Federal Appeals Court Skeptical of DOJ Request to Segregate California Ballots

A federal appeals court held a rare Sunday hearing to consider a Justice Department request to immediately segregate 20,000 California ballots. The court expressed doubt regarding its jurisdiction and the necessity of expedited action by a trial judge.

Share
Coverage
leftcenterrightinternationalinvestigative

A panel of federal appeals court judges signaled significant hesitation regarding a request from the Department of Justice (DOJ) to intervene in the handling of 20,000 California ballots. The DOJ is seeking to have these specific ballots segregated, arguing that they may have been cast by noncitizens. The request was brought before the court during a rare Sunday session, highlighting the urgency the administration feels regarding the matter.

During the proceedings, the judges questioned the legal basis for their involvement at this stage. U.S. Circuit Judge Mark Bennett explicitly challenged the DOJ’s position, stating, “I don’t see how we have jurisdiction.” The court’s skepticism suggests that the judges are unconvinced that a trial judge needs to accelerate the process or that the appeals court has the authority to intervene in the manner requested by the government. The DOJ’s underlying lawsuit aims to address concerns about voter eligibility, but the immediate focus of the hearing remained on the procedural question of whether the court should order the segregation of the ballots while the broader legal challenge continues. As of the hearing's conclusion, the court appeared unlikely to grant the administration's bid for immediate action.

📡 Media Analysis

How each outlet framed the story — angles, word choices, and what they chose to push or ignore.

The HillCenterA

Focused on the procedural hurdles and the court's skepticism toward the DOJ's request.

"skepticism at a rare Sunday hearing"

"bid to immediately segregate""appeared unlikely to immediately agree"

✓ Only outlet to report: Reported the specific quote from Judge Mark Bennett regarding the lack of jurisdiction.

🔍 What Nobody's Reporting

  • ·The specific legal reasoning or evidence the DOJ provided to justify the claim that the 20,000 ballots are likely from noncitizens.
  • ·The response or counter-arguments provided by California election officials or the defendants in the case.

📰 Sources

0 A-rated source(s) among 1 total. Lowest trust: The Hill (B)