U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman of the Southern District of New York has blocked the Trump administration from enforcing an executive order that threatened civil or criminal liability against human rights groups collaborating with the International Criminal Court (ICC). The legal challenge was brought by two U.S.-based organizations that argued the administration’s policy infringed upon their constitutional rights.

In his ruling, Judge Furman stated that the plaintiffs demonstrated a "likelihood of success on the merits" of their claim. The court found that the executive order, which sought to punish entities for providing support to the ICC in its investigations, likely violates the First Amendment rights of the groups to engage in protected speech and advocacy. By issuing this injunction, the court has effectively halted the administration's ability to pursue legal action against these specific organizations while the broader case proceeds.

The administration had previously sought to restrict cooperation with the ICC, citing concerns over the court's jurisdiction and its investigations into U.S. personnel and allies. The plaintiffs argued that their work, which includes providing information and legal support to the ICC, is a form of protected expression. The ruling serves as a significant legal setback for the administration's efforts to exert pressure on the international body through domestic policy. The case remains ongoing, but the injunction provides immediate protection for the groups involved, ensuring they cannot be prosecuted or fined for their ongoing activities related to the ICC at this time.