A controversy has emerged involving former Army officer Khushboo Patani after she provided public advice concerning the purchase and possession of air guns. The remarks have drawn criticism, leading to a broader public debate about the regulations governing non-firearm weapons in the country.

Legal experts and authorities have clarified that even air weapons that fall below the power thresholds typically requiring a formal firearm license are still subject to specific regulations. According to current guidelines, these weapons must be purchased exclusively through authorized, licensed dealers. The controversy centers on whether the advice provided by Patani accurately reflected these legal mandates or if it encouraged practices that could lead to unauthorized possession.

While the specific nature of the advice has not been fully detailed in public reports, the backlash highlights the sensitivity surrounding weapon ownership, even for items classified as air guns. The incident serves as a reminder of the strict oversight maintained by authorities regarding the sale and distribution of any device capable of firing projectiles, regardless of its classification as a firearm or an air weapon. As of now, there has been no official statement from Patani regarding the criticism, and the discussion remains focused on the interpretation of the Arms Act and its application to air-powered devices.