A recently published memoir by former Supreme Court Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul has sparked discussion regarding the relationship between the Indian judiciary and the executive branch. Justice Kaul asserts that the government maintains respect for judges who display a 'spine'—a term he uses to describe judicial independence and the willingness to challenge state authority when necessary.

Central to Kaul’s critique is his assessment of the leadership style of former Chief Justice of India (CJI) D.Y. Chandrachud. Kaul suggests that under Chandrachud’s tenure, the Supreme Court adopted a stance that was too deferential toward the government. This perspective highlights a perceived internal rift within the court, as Kaul implies that a more assertive judicial posture is required to maintain the separation of powers and institutional integrity.

While the memoir provides a personal account of these dynamics, it reflects broader ongoing debates in India about the independence of the judiciary. The Indian Express report frames these comments as a significant critique of the former CJI’s legacy, noting that Kaul’s observations suggest that the court’s perceived softness may have impacted its standing. The report focuses on the tension between the need for judicial cooperation with the state and the necessity of maintaining a firm, independent stance on constitutional matters.