An outlet associated with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) has leveled accusations against Iranian reformist factions, claiming their actions and rhetoric serve to bolster the 'maximum pressure' campaign initiated by the United States. The IRGC-linked report characterizes the reformists' political discourse as a strategic liability that provides leverage to foreign adversaries, specifically referencing the Trump administration's approach to Iran.

This accusation reflects a long-standing internal power struggle within Iran, where hardline institutions like the IRGC frequently frame moderate or reform-oriented political activity as a form of 'soft war' or infiltration. By linking reformist critiques of domestic policy to external U.S. pressure, the IRGC-affiliated media aims to delegitimize the reformist platform by casting it as unpatriotic or aligned with foreign interests.

While the IRGC-affiliated outlet frames these accusations as a matter of national security, independent observers note that such rhetoric is often used to suppress political dissent ahead of elections or during periods of heightened economic instability. The report does not provide specific evidence of coordination between reformists and U.S. officials, relying instead on the interpretation of public statements made by reformist figures. The reformist camp has historically denied these allegations, maintaining that their critiques are intended to improve domestic governance rather than serve foreign powers. The current escalation in media rhetoric highlights the deepening divide between Iran's security apparatus and those advocating for political and social reform.