A motion calling for a public referendum to abolish the position of elected mayor has been defeated by local politicians. The proposal, which sought to let residents decide the future of the mayoral office, was rejected following concerns over the financial implications of such a vote.

The primary point of contention regarding the motion was the estimated cost of £375,000 required to conduct the referendum. Proponents of the motion argued that residents should have a direct say in the governance structure of their area, suggesting that the mayoral post may no longer be necessary or cost-effective. Conversely, those who voted against the motion maintained that the expenditure was unjustifiable and that the current mayoral system remains an effective way to manage local affairs.

While the motion has been formally rejected, the debate highlights ongoing tensions regarding local governance models and the balance between public consultation and fiscal responsibility. The decision effectively maintains the status quo, ensuring the mayoral position remains in place for the foreseeable future. No further plans for a public vote on this issue have been announced by the council following the vote.