One Nation has publicly defended the party's decision to spend $56,000 on a shed situated on the property of James Ashby, a former high-ranking staffer. The expenditure, which has drawn scrutiny, was described by party representatives as an 'unconventional' approach to fundraising.

While the party maintains that the structure serves a legitimate purpose for their operations and financial goals, the nature of the expense has raised questions regarding the use of party funds for private property improvements. The party has not provided extensive details on how the shed functions as a fundraising tool, but they stand by the decision as a strategic use of resources. Critics and observers have questioned the transparency of such spending, noting the unusual arrangement of party-funded infrastructure on a private individual's land.

There is currently no consensus on the long-term financial viability of this project or its effectiveness as a fundraising mechanism. The party's defense centers on the idea that the shed provides necessary utility for their broader goals, despite the unconventional location. As of now, the party has not indicated any intention to recoup the funds or alter the arrangement, maintaining that the expenditure was both authorized and aligned with their internal financial strategies.