As discussions regarding the future of Gaza continue, international stakeholders are exploring the establishment of specialized working groups to manage the reconstruction of the territory. A central point of these ongoing negotiations is the proposal to condition the flow of aid and reconstruction efforts on the immediate disarmament of armed groups operating within Gaza.

Proponents of this approach argue that linking reconstruction to disarmament is a necessary security measure to ensure that infrastructure projects are not repurposed for military use and to prevent the recurrence of conflict. Conversely, critics and humanitarian organizations have expressed concern that conditioning aid on political and security mandates could delay essential relief for civilians who are currently facing a severe humanitarian crisis. While the structure and leadership of these groups remain under discussion, the primary tension lies between the desire for long-term regional stability through disarmament and the urgent need for immediate, unconditional humanitarian assistance. The specific mechanisms for verifying disarmament and the timeline for reconstruction remain points of significant debate among international mediators.