During his second term, President Donald Trump has notably increased his reliance on executive orders to enact policy. This trend marks a departure from traditional governing patterns, as the administration frequently bypasses the legislative process in favor of direct executive action. The Hill reports that this strategy has led to a record-setting number of legal challenges, as the executive branch increasingly finds itself at odds with both the judicial system and Congress.

Observers note that this approach is largely a response to 'legislative scarcity,' a period characterized by a lack of significant lawmaking activity within Congress. By utilizing executive orders, the administration is able to implement its agenda without needing to secure congressional approval. However, this has resulted in a heightened level of judicial pushback, with courts frequently reviewing the legality and scope of these directives. While the administration views these orders as a necessary tool to overcome political gridlock, critics argue that the practice tests the limits of executive power and the system of checks and balances. The situation highlights a growing tension between the executive branch's desire for swift policy implementation and the constitutional requirements of oversight by the other two branches of government.