Following the recent election, the Religious Zionism party has signaled its intent to advance a new, more radical phase of judicial reform. The announcement was accompanied by a controversial social media post from party leader Bezalel Smotrich, which featured an AI-generated video depicting Supreme Court justices and the Attorney General being forcibly removed from a protest setting.

The video has sparked immediate backlash from political figures and legal advocacy groups. Gadi Eisenkot, a prominent political opponent, publicly condemned the imagery, labeling the content as "despicable." Similarly, the director of the Israel Bar Association criticized the move, characterizing the video as a form of "incitement" that undermines democratic norms and the rule of law.

While the party frames these proposed changes as a necessary step to fulfill their electoral mandate and reform the judicial system, critics argue that the methods used to promote the agenda—specifically the use of inflammatory AI-generated content—represent a dangerous escalation in political rhetoric. The disagreement centers not only on the substance of the proposed judicial changes but also on the appropriateness of the party's communication strategies in a polarized political climate. As of now, the specific legislative details of the "more radical" overhaul have not been fully outlined, leaving the scope of the proposed changes subject to ongoing debate.