A significant $60 billion funding agreement is currently facing widespread opposition from state governments across Australia. According to reports, nearly every state is actively looking to terminate or exit the deal, with the notable exception of one jurisdiction that continues to support the existing framework.

The agreement, which carries a total value of $60 billion, appears to be a point of major contention between federal and state-level administrators. While the specific terms of the deal and the reasons for the states' desire to withdraw remain largely opaque in current reporting, the consensus among the majority of states suggests a fundamental disagreement regarding the deal's structure or its long-term financial viability.

The situation highlights a growing rift in intergovernmental relations, as the states attempt to distance themselves from a policy that was presumably intended to provide stability or infrastructure support. The identity of the single state still participating in the agreement has not been explicitly named in the available reporting, nor have the specific mechanisms for withdrawal been detailed. As the situation develops, the primary point of friction remains the discrepancy between the federal government's original intent for the $60 billion package and the current reality of near-unanimous state-level rejection.