The Supreme Court of India recently addressed the ongoing travel restrictions imposed by the Centre and Delhi Police in the national capital. During the proceedings, the bench expressed dissatisfaction with the blanket nature of the curbs, which have significantly disrupted metro and train operations. The court cautioned authorities against using excessive force or overly broad measures to manage security concerns, famously remarking that one should not "use a hammer to kill a fly."

While the specific security context was not detailed in the report, the court's directive signals a push for a more balanced approach that minimizes public inconvenience. The judiciary is essentially calling for a shift from total shutdowns to more targeted security protocols. The Centre and Delhi Police are now expected to review these restrictions to ensure that essential public transport remains functional while maintaining necessary safety standards. The court's intervention highlights a recurring tension between maintaining public order and ensuring the mobility of citizens in a densely populated urban environment.