The Supreme Court has officially denied petitions seeking changes to the High-Powered Enquiry Committee (HPEC) tasked with reviewing the NEET-UG examination controversy. The court maintained that the current structure of the committee should remain intact for the time being, emphasizing that the judicial process must first address serious allegations regarding the conduct of law enforcement during recent student protests.

Central to the court's decision is the requirement for a thorough investigation into claims of police brutality. Specifically, the court highlighted the need to examine reports concerning the use of pellet guns and other alleged excesses against protesters. By prioritizing these human rights and safety concerns, the court signaled that the integrity of the protest response must be established before broader administrative changes to the HPEC can be considered.

While the petitioners had argued for modifications to the committee to ensure a more favorable or transparent oversight process, the bench remained firm on its current course. The court’s stance suggests a focus on accountability for state actions as a prerequisite to resolving the underlying examination disputes. As of now, the HPEC will continue its work under its existing mandate, while the judiciary awaits further evidence regarding the specific incidents of force used by authorities during the demonstrations.