Hamas stated on Friday that it has agreed to surrender its weapons to a Palestinian governing committee as part of a ceasefire framework supported by the United States. The proposal, which Donald Trump has described as a "historic" deal, outlines a process for the gradual withdrawal of Israeli military forces from the Gaza Strip.

However, the path to implementation remains unclear. While Hamas has signaled a willingness to disarm, the Israeli government has issued a firm condition: it will not initiate a military withdrawal until the militant group has been completely disarmed. This creates a potential stalemate, as both sides appear to have different expectations regarding the timing and sequence of the disarmament and withdrawal process.

Media outlets have expressed varying levels of confidence in the agreement. Some reports emphasize the deal as a breakthrough in the conflict, while others highlight the significant logistical and political hurdles that remain. Analysts note that the lack of a clear, mutually agreed-upon timeline for these actions leaves the deal vulnerable to collapse. Furthermore, the specific composition of the "Palestinian governing committee" tasked with receiving the weapons has not been fully defined, leading to questions about who will oversee the transition and ensure compliance from all parties involved.