thread.news
← Back
BGenerally CredibleWorld🇺🇸US8/14/2026, 3:00:32 AM
Trump Directs Pentagon to Revert Aircraft Carriers to Steam-Powered Launch Systems

Trump Directs Pentagon to Revert Aircraft Carriers to Steam-Powered Launch Systems

President Trump has issued a national security memorandum ordering the Navy to replace electromagnetic aircraft launch systems with traditional steam-powered catapults on future carriers. The directive mandates a design shift for upcoming vessels, moving away from the technology currently used on the Gerald R. Ford-class ships.

Share
Coverage
leftcenterrightinternationalinvestigative

President Trump has formally directed the Department of Defense to transition future U.S. aircraft carriers back to steam-powered catapult systems for launching fighter jets. This move reverses the Navy’s long-standing shift toward the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS), a technology that has been in development and deployment for over a decade. The order, signed Thursday, tasks Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao with overseeing the redesign of upcoming carriers to accommodate the older, steam-based technology.

This decision marks the fulfillment of a long-standing preference expressed by Trump, who has criticized electromagnetic systems since at least 2017. While the administration views this as a necessary return to proven technology, the shift presents significant logistical and financial challenges.

Sources provide differing perspectives on the implications of this mandate. NDTV highlights the potential for substantial fiscal strain, noting that the redesign could cost billions of dollars. Furthermore, NDTV reports that the transition may exacerbate existing personnel shortages, as steam systems require more sailors to operate than the automated electromagnetic counterparts, at a time when the Navy is already struggling with 20,000 unfilled positions. In contrast, The Guardian focuses on the political history of the decision, framing it as the culmination of years of public complaints by Trump regarding modern carrier technology. While both outlets agree on the core directive, they differ in their emphasis: one focuses on the operational and economic burden, while the other emphasizes the personal nature of the President's long-held policy goal.

📡 Media Analysis

How each outlet framed the story — angles, word choices, and what they chose to push or ignore.

NDTVCenterA

Focused on the practical, financial, and staffing consequences of the order.

"The switch could cost billions"

"older system""Trump Orders"

✓ Only outlet to report: Reported the specific statistic regarding the Navy's 20,000 unfilled fleet positions.

The GuardianLeftB

Framed the decision as a personal obsession of Trump's that ignores modern military progress.

"loudly complaining"

"old-fashioned""had his heart set on"

✓ Only outlet to report: Mentioned the specific 2017 Time magazine interview where Trump first proposed the idea.

🔍 What Nobody's Reporting

  • ·Lack of technical input from naval engineers regarding the actual performance differences between EMALS and steam systems.
  • ·No information on whether the Navy has already begun feasibility studies or if this order halts current construction projects.

📰 Sources

0 A-rated source(s) among 2 total. Lowest trust: NDTV (B)