The University of Pittsburgh has come under scrutiny following the publication of a report addressing antisemitism on its campus. The primary point of contention is that the working group responsible for the document did not solicit testimony or input from the university's approximately 1,400 Jewish students during the drafting process.

While the working group consisted of members who identify as Jewish, student organizations and community advocates have expressed frustration that the very population most affected by the issue was excluded from the investigative phase. The university has defended the composition of the committee, describing it as a "very diverse group" of individuals tasked with evaluating the campus climate. However, the absence of direct student participation has led to concerns regarding the report's thoroughness and its ability to accurately reflect the lived experiences of Jewish students at the institution.

There is a clear disagreement regarding the legitimacy of the process. Those critical of the report argue that a study on antisemitism conducted without the voices of the students it intends to protect is inherently flawed. Conversely, the university’s stance suggests that the internal expertise of the working group was sufficient to address the subject matter. As of now, the university has not indicated whether it plans to supplement the report with additional student testimony or revise its findings based on the feedback received since the publication.